Friday, 14 June 2019

Just a quick update to say I'm still kicking.

Been a quiet month or so and so I thought I better write something for this blog.  ;-)

First off I got fed up trying to get a clean signal from the Gemini 2-500 PA using the Anglian transverter and Icom 7300.   No matter what I seemed to do I could not stop it from occasionally causing splatter, along with the RF surges in power when first keying the transmitter.    Now this isn't to say the IC7300 is a bad radio it isn't but it certainly doesn't like playing the transverter and Gemini.    So to resolve the issue I went and bought an Elecraft K3S which has resolved all the issues and ok it's an expensive fix but the transmitter of the K3S is certainly worlds ahead of the IC7300, though I do still prefer the audio from the 7300 which is much easier on the ears.  

One of the nice things about using the K3S is the fact it displays the right frequency when using the transverters and in fact with in a few days of having it I also discovered it out from TTL logic from the ACC port so you can interface some kind of transverter switching.    

With the above in mind I wondered if a simple transverter switch and device sequencer could be bought and though I did find a couple they were quiet expensive so I decided to roll my own using an Arduino so a couple of prototypes later I've come up with a design with will switch between my 2m and 70cm transverters and handle the device sequencing for both units below is a couple of screenshots from KiCad of the front panel indicator and main board.  I'll do a full write up once I've confirmed all works as expected.  

A quick feature list is as follows.

  1. Handles two transverter. 
  2. Provides TX inhibit. 
  3. First sequence event can provide 12 - 28V up to a couple of amps to drive change over relays.
  4. Sequence events two and three can sink up to 40mA, though you could chuck in a darlington pair if you want to sequence more relays.
  5. The unit interfaces with my Wavenode so that if a high VSWR is seen the unit automatically ceases transmitting and puts the unit into the default RX mode.
  6. All sequence event are optocoupled to the Arduino just in case a FET or BJT decides to go legs up in a funny way.
Front panel layout from KiCad
Main board layout from KiCad.

I've also got another project on the go in the form of a 70cm 250W amplifier which I bought from eBay from a German amateur which was quite cheap at 55 Euros.  

70cm 250W PA module from eBay.
I rather helpfully came across the website of PA0EHG who had bought the same unit and documented what he had done to get the unit going on the 70cm band so once I've got a replacement RF terminator as the one that came with the unit the solder tab fell off as soon as I touched it I'll power it and see what's what.

So that's the end of this update I'll do a proper update once everything has progressed a bit further.

Wednesday, 3 April 2019

The Y Factor

Over the past couple of years I’ve been attempting to build a high performance two metre station and as such have been slowly making modifications and upgrades with that goal in mind. One of the upgrades I carried out was to change from an FT991 to an IC7300 coupled with an Anglian 3L two meter transverter from G4DDK1.

Though the upgrades and modifications have worked quite well I felt there was still room for improvement but with no quantitative measurements being taken during the upgrades you start to fool yourself with how those changes are actually performing.

A good indication of receiver performance is to measure the noise figure, the Anglian 3L has a quoted noise figure of between 1.6 - 1.8 dB whereas the FT991’s noise figure is 5 dB at two metres, so how do we go about doing measuring this for ourselves?

Caveat :  I’m not going to talk too much about what is a Y factor measurement or about noise figures in general there are two excellent documents from Keysight that explain both in far more detail than I could do justice, these two documents are called “Fundamentals of RF and Microwave Noise Figure”2 and “Noise Figure Measurement Accuracy: The Y-Factor Method”3.

So what does the noise figure represent?  Well the noise figure is a measurement of the degradation of the Signal to Noise Ratio introduced into the signal chain by the devices which make up the chain,  a lower figure indicates better performance. 

To measure the noise figure of a receiver you require two pieces of equipment a calibrated noise source and a means of taking the measurement.

A good quality calibrated noise source from Ailgent would cost you hundreds of pounds even for a second hand one which is out of reach of most amateurs.   

There is an alternative however available in the guise of the RXGen noise source from RFDesign4, also  available from the same company are the RFD2305 ENR 5dB  +/- 0.25dB and the  RFD2315 ENR 15dB +/- 0.25dB precision noise sources available for around twice the cost.

The RXGen is a 2MHz - 2.4GHz noise source with a measured ENR (Excess Noise Ratio) of 10dB +/- 0.5dB which costs seventy eight pounds including postage.    

This means you can take measurements with an accuracy of +/- 0.5dB. We will also need someway of measuring the noise figure but again a good quality noise figure meter such as the HP 8970 PANFI is likely to set you back hundreds of pounds second hand.  

We can however use simpler equipment but with the proviso we accept we’ll not be able to measure noise figures below 2dB with any certainty.

A ‘Y’ factor measurement is defined as the ratio between thermal noise, defined as 290k for a 50ohm calibrated load at an ambient temperature of 17 deg C, and  the noise source when switched on, we can make the measurement as a simple voltage ratio or the difference between the two measurements in measured in decibels.  

It’s worth mentioning temperature can have a profound affect on the measured noise figure this especially comes in to play for low noise figures.

There are a number of ways of taking the measurement the simplest being to use a digital voltmeter,  the accuracy of using this method will be dependant on the quality of the meter employed,  I used a cheap UNI-T meter and obtained good results despite the meter not being a true RMS model.  

The second method uses a PC’s sound card with either SpectraVue5 in continuum mode or an excellent piece of software called NFM from Owen Duffy VK2OMD6.

So let's try to measure the NF of a Icom 7300 on the 10m band with pre-amp one switched on.

To measure the noise figure  we first need to connect a calibrated 50ohm load to antenna socket.

The RXGen will act as a 50ohm load when unpowered, technically we should use a calibrated 50ohm load but I’ve found the difference in measured noise figure is smaller than the indicated accuracy of measurement available and as such the RXGen is a perfectly adequate.

Before taking the measurement ensure the radio’s AGC is set to off otherwise set it to its slowest available setting. 

Next we need to connect the headphone or speaker output to the DVM,  I used a 3.5mm stereo jack to a couple of banana plugs to connect the DVM via the IC7300 headphone socket.

With the load connected set the radio’s audio gain for a quiescent value of say 50mV.

You can see in the following image the meter reads 50mV in reality the meter will vary by a few millivolts either way so I tend to watch the meter for a few seconds and take the lowest value.

Meter reading noise source switched off.

Next we apply power to the RXGen and read the lowest active value in this case 90mV.

Meter reading noise source switched on.

To find the Y factor we need to find the ratio between the quiescent and active values,  90 / 50 = 1.8, we can then use the chart supplied with the RXGen to find the noise figure for the given voltage ratio.   

Note you can calculate this by hand using the formulae given in the Keysight documents but with the level of accuracy available with the RXGen the chart method is perfectly adequate.

Measured NF using Voltage ratio method.

Reading from the above chart the measured noise figure is approximately 6.3dB,  which is near to the figure quoted by Icom for the IC7300 of 7.12dB for the 10m band with the first pre-amp switched on.

When taking measurements with a DVM I would advise you take more than one reading and take the average however I found even if you do this unless, you have a true RMS meter, the result can be off by +/- 1dB.

A more accurate way to measure the Y factor is to use SpectraVue, you will need to connect the device to be tested via either its headphone or speaker output to the computers sound card, this can lead to ground loops so it would be best to use a sound card such as the Signalink to carryout any measurement or use a 1:1  isolation transformer.  

The IC7300 has a built in sound card so I will use that to carry out the measurement,  however this will mean the noise figure of the sound card will also be included in the measurement.

You can see in the image below SpectraVue is running in continuum mode with FTT averaging and smoothing applied, indicated by the red arrows, with the load connected SpectraVue gives a quiescent value of -83.35dB circled in red.

SpectraVue quiescent measurement.
Applying power to the  RXGen wait for the peak reading to stabilise in SpectraVue at which point obtain the active value -78.48dB, shown circled in red below.

SpectraVue active measurement.
Subtracting the quiescent value from the active value will yield a Y Factor in dB of 4.87dB.

Again using the documentation that comes with the RXGen we can read off the chart to obtain a NF reading of 7dB as shown below.
Y Factor measurement using dB method.
We can see the reading is in agreement with the published NF and very close to our original reading using the DVM method.

The last method utilises a piece of software called  NFM from Owen Duffy VK2OMD the software is restricted by default to an integration interval of 0.5s  you can however request a licence from Owen if you want to use a long interval,  you can find his email address on he’ll email you a licence for free eventually.

When using NFM you must enter the noise source’s specified ENR specified in the case of the RXGen 10dB as depicted in the below image.

To obtain a reading set the sound card you are using as the default device for the system otherwise NFM will not use it. 

With the noise source switched off press the ‘1 Noise LO’ button indicated by the red ‘A’ once a quiescent value has been found apply power to the RXGen and press the ‘2 Noise HI’ button indicated the by the red letter ‘B’ after a moment the calculated noise figure will be displayed as circled in red.

NFM will indicate if the sound cards level is either too high or low by displaying a line of red asterisks, in this case just adjust the level to a suitable value using the gain controls for the device being used.

NFM noise figure measurement.
We can again see this is in agreement with SpectraVue if you look at the Y(2)(dB) field, shown above, it gives the Y factor in dB which is 4.88dB  a difference of 0.01dB but this time we have a slightly better noise figure of 6.83dB since this is calculated by the software and not reliant on use reading from the supplied chart. 

I have also included below an image of NFM doing the same measurement but with a longer integration interval of 30s and you see the noise figure has only changed by 0.2dB this indicates the longer integration interval isn’t of any real use when using the RXGen noise source. 

NFM extended integration time.
The nice thing about NFM is its ability to do multiple stage measurements simply and quickly without having to crunch the numbers by hand saving a quite a bit of time if you’re making a lot of measurements.

In the following example the equipment is set up in the following manner which is my default operating configuration.

NOTE : Normally you wouldn’t have any additional attenuation in the signal path when taking a two stage measurement it’s only included here because of the difficulty I have in reconfiguring my equipment.
System configuration for two stage measurement.
First take a reading with just the RXGen and IC7300 connected, as we did in the above example, first by pressing the button labeled A to take the quiescent value and then the button labeled B with the RXGen powered to take obtain the active value which yields a noise figure of 6.28dB circled in blue.

Next we add the Anglian 3L, 3dB splitter and 20dB attenuator in to the signal path.   

Now find the quiescent state value by pressing the button labeled C.

For a two stage measurement you must include any attenuation between devices otherwise the measurement will either not work or be inaccurate, so we enter the total value of any attenuation in the box labeled D.

Lastly we find the active state value by powering on the RXgen again and pressing the button labeled E this yields a total noise figure for the system of 6.48dB again circled in blue.

You may ask yourself why is the noise figure so high if the Anglian has a stated noise figure of 1.9dB?  The reason for this is the attenuation introduced by the splitter and attenuator negates any additional gain the Anglian has provided and therefore resulting in a noise figure is more or less in line with the specified noise figure for the IC7300.

However since we’ve done a two stage measurement we can find the noise figure and RX gain of the Anglian by looking at the device under test section of NFM where we can see we have an RX gain of 25dB and a noise figure of 2.5dB both circled in red.  

This is in good agreement with the Anglian’s quoted specification of an RX gain of 25dB and noise figure of 1.9dB. 

NFM two stage measurement.
It’s worth pointing out the additional passive devices and cables in the signal path will have affected our measured noise figure for the Anglian you should attempt to keep any cabling between devices as short as possible at lower frequencies even the leads from the battery can add additional noise.

I hope this short article has encouraged you start experimenting with taking noise figure measurements with a simple low cost noise source it can lead to hours of fun discovering where or where not your system is performing as expected. 

This article was first published in the March 2019 edition of QUA the new letter of the  Cray Valley Radio Society.

Wednesday, 27 March 2019

A Tale of Spectrum Pollution - Update 2

Typically as soon as a couple of kind amateurs from my radio club arrange to come down and to DF the source of the noise on 2m and 70cm which has been present for 9 months switching on and off at the same time it packs up, grrrrr.  

The noise has dropped from S6 between 15:00 - 08:00 to S4 between 08:00 - 22:00 by the looks of it the best we might be able to reduce the noise to is S3 but and improvement of 18dBm.

Original spectrum pollution measurement.

Latest spectrum pollution measurement.

Monday, 11 March 2019

A Tale of Spectrum Pollution - Update

My original measurements of spectrum pollution at JO01JK were slightly off.   It turned out the noise floor for the sound card in SpectrumLab was -97dBFS and as such when I took the first measurement with the 50ohm calibrated load connected the generated noise was below the noise floor of the sound card, I've now corrected for this and taken another measurement.

Noise against HF calibrated S-Meter

Noise against VHF calibrated S-Meter

This seems to show the noise here isn't quite as bad as I originally thought though the 6dB rise in noise caused by the apparent outside light coming on is still annoying and will need to be tracked down and fingers crossed replaced.

All the measurements I've taken so far are to the West which is the worse direction for noise and so I'll need to repeat the measurements every 45deg from North at some point just to get a base level at which to compare any apparent increase in noise in the future.

While I was at it I also did a quick calibration of the S-Meter on the IC7300 with the Anglian 3L 2m transverter using a Marconi TF2015 signal generator.   I set the output of the TF2015 to -47dBm I then used some SMA attenuators to reduce the level down to the various S-Point values for a HF receiver so in some cases I'm up to 2dB off the required power.

All measurements taken in 2.7kHz bandwidth with the AGC set too slow.

Saturday, 9 March 2019

A Tail of Spectrum Pollution.

Last autumn I installed a new antenna system for two metres and immediately notice a huge rise in wideband noise and birdies across the whole two metre band, other bother!

As with all these things I tend to go at it like a bull in a china shop and only afterwards realise I should have taken some measurements of noise or even of the local beacon, oh bother!

Well the first thing to do is turn the mains power off to house and take a quick look a the waterfall on the rig compared with it on.

Mains switched off.

And with the mains switched back on again.

Mains switched on.

Wow! Ok I wasn't expecting that.  

Next thing to do is turn the mains off again and slow turn each circuit back on by the fuse box, in my case everything stayed looking good until I hit the sockets that power all my AV equipment and WIFI / Lan access point at which point all the birdies flew back in. ;-)

Next up I switched off all the AV equipment and the router and slowly switched each item back on the first item happened to be the access point and low and behold the waterfall filled up again.

I then unplugged everything from the access point other than the power supply and again the interference vanished so wasn't being caused by the WIFI, SMPS or the unit itself.  

Now I should mention I run CAT5 cabling to various devices such as the media server, sky box etc ... 

For each CAT5 cable I wound 6 turns around a type 43 ferrite torrid, available from the RSGB shop,  at both ends of each CAT5 cable in turn checking each time if the birdies had reduced.   

What I found was any cable run over half a metre in length need to have ferrites fitted and with the longer run cables, in excess of  a metre, need two of more ferrites at each end to get enough impedance to reduce the birdies. 

After what seemed like an extraordinary length of time, hey these things take ages to do from a wheelchair, I finally managed to get a handle on the birdies to the point they're almost no existent. 

Noise after ferrites fitted.

Ok this is looking good a lot better than it did originally, and again being a wally I should have a taken a measurement of the overall noise floor and not just glance at the waterfall.

So I next setup SpectrumLab to log my local noise pollution towards the West for a few days to measure the general noise level. 

SpectrumLab with Plotter logging Spectrum Noise.

To calibrate the system I took a long plot to start with of a calibrated 50ohm load @ 290K with a 2.7kHz bandwidth.

A 50ohm load at 290K is equal to -174dBm/Hz so in a 2.7kHz bandwidth -140dBm.

I only I had a couple of days measurement I wrote a quick Python program to display the results in dBm's and S-Points.  
Now S-Points, a totally bloody useless measurement of anything if you ask me. ;-)  I had a quick look at S-Meters on Wikipedia and there appears to be two IARU technical recommendations for S-Meters one for HF defined as -73dBm for S9 with a 50 ohm impedance and another for VHF as being -93dBm for S9 again with a 50ohm impedance system  both with 6dB increments between points. 

So I did two plots one with the HF specification 

Scaled with HF S-Meter Specification.

and another with the VHF spec.

Scaled with VHF S-Meter Specification.

The first thing we can see if the chart using the VHF S-Meter specification looks horrendous while the HF doesn't look that bad and I'm inclined to go with the HF chart instead.

The second thing we can notice is at around 15:00 everyday and until 08:00 the following morning there appears to be an outside light being switched on which is raising the noise floor by 6dB so that'll  need to be tracked and sorted out.   

I still need to take some measurement with the house mains off again just to see if the noise floor drop at all but I do now feel as if I getting a handle on situation even if there's plenty left to do. 

Friday, 1 March 2019

Kuhne Electronics IC7300 IF Transverter Mod Board - Update 2

I original posted I had issues with the Kuhne IC7300 IF interface and had removed the modification, I now believe the issue was partially the interface and board and partially a user issue.

I bought a new interface board and fitted it along with the additional 47ohm resistor that is meant to resolve the TX oscillation issues and so far no funnies have been seen.

The issues I originally reported with the RX side of things were all due to my lack of understanding than to do the interface board.  

The main issue was the Anglian 3L transverter gives about 21dB gain this is such a high amount of gain it reduced the dynamic range considerably which though it made the receiver very hot it also picked up all the local RF noise was causing me a headache.

What I've since realised is I should have added some attenuation to the RX path before the 7300 in fact I've added just enough to give me a noise figure or around 2dB which is in line with the quoted specification for the Anglian this results in almost no loss in dynamic range.

The only problem I found was having such a hot receiver was I need to pay a lot more attention to local generated RF noise than I had previously and after an afternoon of slowly switching all the electronics off the house and a huge amount of ferrite I managed to reduce the noise and birdies by 10dB.

So I need to apologise to Kuhne for writing such a horrid review of the IC7300 IF interface when the reality is most of the issues were down to me being a draft bugger.

Tuesday, 1 January 2019

Squares, squares, squares 2018

Well the new year has been and gone and as we head into 2019 I thought it would be interesting to see my stations performance on 2m and 70cm since I was first licenced.  

The station setup has evolved greatly on the past 12 months and so I thought I'd share the evolution and how it performed.

In 2017 I started the year with a Yaesu FT991 with a single 9 element 2m LFA  and 13 element 70cm LFA from G0KSC, my maximum output power was 50W.

2m Squares 2017

You can see from the above I managed to work 55 squares using mainly SSB, JT65, FSK and JTMS.

70cm Squares 2017

Again from the above we see I managed a rather pathetic 9 squares all on sideband.  

In 2018 the station evolved from the FT991 to using homebrew transverters the rather fine 2m Anglian 3L and 70cm Iceni units from G4DDK.  I swapped to an Icom IC7300 for the exciter. 

The 2m system started the year with a Microset SR100 100W linear and ended the year with the mighty fine Gemini 2-500 500W linear from the dxshop.    

I actually had the amplifier and running before I got around to updating the 2m antenna system not because this is the right way but down to the fact taking an amplifier out of the packaging is a lot easier than updating the antennas. 

I then changed the 2m antenna system from the single 9 element KSC to a stack of 2 x 9 element G4CQM's from Powabeam.   

It took me awhile to get the new CQM's built as I bought them as kits from Powabeam which meant I need to cut the elements and construct the driven element.   I got the new system up and running at the beginning of September and it worked like a dream right up until it rained hard when the VSWR suddenly went to infinity so that put paid to any 2m work for September. 

2m Squares worked from JO01 2018

You can see from above a slight improvement in performance this year and I think I managed to miss just about every opening typical!  Anyway I still managed to work 86 squares and good improvement over the 56 from the year before.

The 70cm system didn't change much beyond the move the to the Iceni I stayed with the same antenna setup as the previous year still driven with 50W.

70cm Squares worked from JO01 2018

You can see I didn't work on 70cm too much mainly down to no easy way of switching between the transverters but I still managed to work 25 squares, mostly during the 70cm UKAC, but still a big improvement on the 9 squares the previous year.  

Fingers crossed 2019 will be even better and I'm actually near the shack during any opening but we'll have to wait and see.

Wednesday, 12 December 2018

Easy Rotator Control 4 and the Yaesu G450C Rotator.

For ages now I've been reaching across the bench keeping my finger pressed on the rotator controller switch when changing beam heading and I've finally got fed up with the agro of doing this when a PC based solution is available in the form of the Easy Rotator Controller (ERC) from schmidt-alba.

The ERC is small PCB consisting of relays and a ATmega micro controller to monitor the rotator feedback voltage and operate the relays taking on the role of the existing CW and CCW switches.

The controller is available in a number of configurations, I choose to purchase the Version 4 USB controller as most PC's today do not come with a built in serial port.

The controller is available as either a kit or prebuilt.   I  decided to get the kit form, as any respecting amateur would, for £79.47 including postage and packing which is a £20 pound saving on the prebuilt unit.

The kit comes in four packages consisting of a high quality USB cable, software CD, component bag and another bag with the PCB, DC power connector and some cable to wire the ERC up to your existing controller.

Contents of ERC kit package.

The component bag consists of all the components to be soldered onto the supplied PCB.

The supplied kit components.
PCB, DC power plug, cable and PCB standoffs.

The kit has very few parts as you would expect based around a ATMega 328P 8 Bit micro controller, a crystal for the processor clock some capacitors, a couple of diodes and chokes, a few resistors and a small 70cm x 60cm PCB plus the USB interface, relays and terminal blocks.

I started by first installing all the discrete components, IC holders and the USB interface board which took about half an hour to complete.

The completed board minus relays and terminals.

Once the above was completed I installed the rest of the components.

The completed board ready for the IC's to be fitted.

Once the board is completed you apply 12V DC to the unit and test that you get 12V and 5V at the test points located on the DC port side of the board assuming these pan out you insert the ICs and then start modifying the original rotator controller to take the ERC board.

With the easy bit completed the next job is to disassemble the Yaesu controller and do some metalworking.

Taking the Yaesu controller unit apart isn't a five minute job what you need to do is unplug the power cable from the front power switch and then pop out the cable clamp and remove the lead from the case, you next need to desolder the fuse holder from the transformer and remove holder from the chassis again this isn't easy as everything is covered in blue thread lock, next up remove the control cable 6 pin molex socket.    With all the cables removed you now need to remove screws holding the top instrumentation tray to the front and back panels, this is done to allow access to the nuts and bolts holding the mains transformer to the bottom of the chassis which again has blue lock thread, Yaesu really don't want this unit to fall apart. ;-)   With all the above removed you can now get on with marking the holes from the DC PWR and USB ports.

There's a handy sticky label template that comes with the ERC controller which is perfect for marking the hole placements.

The rear of the controller box with the holes cut for the DC power
and USB connector.

Now you can see from the above picture the holes didn't quite align horizontally and this was down to me being a wally and instead of adding a couple of millimetres to the template I did the opposite and removed a couple of millimetres instead, so had I carried out that operation successfully everything would have aligned.   I still ended up with yet another problem shown below.

ERC fitted within the original rotator controller.

If you look at where the PCB stand offs are in relationship to the case fixing holes in the chassis even though there is enough height clearance so that the screws do not foul on the underside of the PCB what I hadn't taken into account was the fact the case wraps around the chassis when screwed together, this meant I needed to mount the PCB using only the two PCB mounts towards the middle of the chassis.   Now this is in fact fine the board isn't being put under any stress though these mistakes are annoying no one will be able to see them.

The original rotator gubbins replaced and the ERC cables attached.

I then replaced the front panel, power supply and original controller board with this done I could strip some insulation off halfway along both the brown and white wires this is so the ERC can be placed in parallel to the rotator and Yaesu controller to measure the feedback voltage which keeps track of the beam heading.

The control button side of the controller. 

Now the tricky part is to connect the blue and black wires from the ERC controller on the original controller heading controls these switches already have a couple of quite thick gauge wires attached to them and attaching the new wires along with the originals is a bit of a pig but if you start with the switch nearest to the mains transformer it's not too bad.

With the ERC controller connected you can refit the outer case and reconnect the unit the rotator and plug the controller back into the mains and station DC power supply you can then move on to calibrating the unit.

On the software CD you'll find two pieces of software one to calibrate the unit and another to control the unit with.  

The calibration is a little bit more involved for the Yaesu G450C rotator in that you need to do an extended calibration.   This involves calibrating at more headings than would be normal.   The general gist of the procedure is to start the calibration software as shown below.

Calibration Software
Once you have set the controllers com port, which you find in the Windows device manager, you'll be able to read the ERC memory.   Next you need to set the rotator fully counter clockwise, using the Yaesu controller, once set to 0 degrees you can perform an extended calibration by using the "Extended 1" function which measures the rotator feedback voltage at 30 degrees intervals once each interval has been measured the software will tell you to advance to the next calibration point.  

A point to be aware of is make sure when you are setting the Yaesu controller that you look straight on to the Yaesu controller heading indicator otherwise you can calibrate to the wrong heading.  

Once the calibration has been completed close the calibration software and start the rotator control software shown below.

The control software supplied with the kit.
Once the rotator control software has started remember to set the com port and wait few moments for the software to connect.   Now click on a point on the compass and the rotator should start to turn to the position you selected and check the Yaesu controller agrees with the software, try this a few times to confirm the calibration if the calibration is off you'll need to repeat the calibration again.

Though the supplied software is ok it's very basic and in fact I replaced with PstRotator from YO3DMU it's an excellent piece of software and though you need to pay 20 Euro's for the licence it's a bargain and I wouldn't use anything else.  The software can set with presets for quick heading changes, you can open a map and click at any point and the beam moves to that head, the other nice feature if you live near the coast is have the beams turn into the wind when the wind speed exceeds a threshold of you choice.


This is one of those projects that starts off as a 'nice to have' which turns into 'how did I ever manage without it' I'm sure no one would regret adding the ERC to their rotator controller.

Wednesday, 3 October 2018

2m Antenna Update

After spending next to four weeks off the air due to the new antenna system suddenly going high VSWR 6:1 the guys, Dave and Fred, finally managed to get the system down for us to check where the fault lay typically when I test the VSWR before taking it down the fault had cleared on its own.

Originally the system gave a VSWR of 1.1:1 until it rained when it went high, now since that point it hasn't rained so I can only assume during the intervening period whatever had got damp had since dried out.

All the connectors looked dry with no indication of water ingress seen, the coupler was also bone dry.   The powabeams use an ABS moulding to fix the driven elements to the beam and this is glued shut during manufacture so it's impossible to open without destroying the moulding in the process.

We put more rubber sealant on around the Powabeam ABS moulding, the end caps on the coupler and around the N-Type sockets on the coupler as well I also wrapped self amalgamating tape around the ends and over the centre hole that gives access to the middle socket.

We then put the system back together with all joint resealed with amalgamating tape it now looks like it should take being dipped into the sea before it leaks but only time will tell.

The only modification we made was to make the quarter wave chokes as depicted on the Powabeam website originally we put the loop over the back of the beam which certainly worked however both Dave and I have Powabeams and switched the recommended way of creating the choke which we both agree seems to give a better response.

I used the system again in this weeks 2m UKAC and it worked flawlessly so fingers crossed it'll carry on working.

Again a big thanks to Dave M1DNJ and Fred for doing all the manual labour.

Tuesday, 18 September 2018

DCI-145-2H 2m Filter.

I recently swapped an unwanted Daiwa VSWR meter for a DCI-145-2H 4 pole bandpass filter for 2 metres.   I don't really need it however I have on the odd occasion thought it might help with some strong out of band signals that occasionally pop up so swapping an unwanted piece of equipment for a piece that might be useful I thought was a good deal.

DCI quote the following specification.

Centre Frequency : 145MHz
Band Width : 2MHz
SWR : < 1.3:1
Return Loss : >18dB

DCI measure the filter response at the following intervals.

135 MHz : -72.650 dB
140 MHz : -46.450 dB
145 MHz : -0.755   dB
150 MHz : -42.981 dB
155 MHz : -65.548 dB

Out of pure interest I thought I see what I measured the above as using the DG8SAQ VNWA.

Filter response etc measured with the VNWA.
As you can see the filter specifications for SWR, RL as described the only difference is with the filter skirt readings being slightly off but in quite good agreement with DCI which I'll assume used a slightly better VNA than the one I have. ;-)

Saturday, 8 September 2018

New 2m Antenna Is Finally Installed.

With the help of my nephew Fred and Dave M1DNJ I've finally got the two new Powabeam 9 ele CQM's installed, see my previous post for specifications.

Fred got the job of taking down the original system which consisted of a single 9 ele LFA from InnoAntenna this antenna has worked faultlessly and in fact I only switched to the CQM design due to weight, I don't have a tilt over mast so the stub needs to be lifted into place with the top beam as well as the coupler and 70cm beam by hand not a easy task while standing on a ladder, the LFA even survived being dropped into a hedge from 8m with the rotator and mast attached when the guys from MM0CUG took the antenna down before fitting it to the new mast.

The original 2m LFA with a 70cm 12 ele above.
The first thing to do was remove the original antennas Fred duly got on the steps and disconnected the antenna tails and loosened the rotator stub clamps.

Fred disconnecting feeder and loosening clamps
With antenna removed Fred G-Clamped the new rotator cage to the garden bench and fitted the rotator and thrust bearing which we both proceeded to align. 

Rotator, Thrust Bearing Fitted and Aligned. 
With the rotator and bearing completed Fred got on with the task of fitting all 18 parasitic elements as well as the driven elements to the booms ready for installation.

Fred with set square fitting the parasitics.

Dave M1DNJ and Fred along with Amber then got on with fitting the rotator cage including stub mast, top beam, power coupler and 70cm to the mast thank the gods Fred has good arm strength and a taste of heights.

Stub with top beam, 70cm beam and cage fitted.
Next up was fitting the bottom beam to the mast. 

Bottom beam being attached to stub.
And finally connecting up the bottom beam to the coupler and jobs a good un. 

Coupler connections all done.
And lastly fixing the cables to the mast.

All most done.
Hurrah the finished system finally raised.

The new system raised.
The system gives an VSWR of 1.1:1 @ 144.300MHz with a resistance of 45ohms and reactance of 2 ohms.  

I must give thanks to Dave M1DNJ, Fred and Amber putting up with me trying to run them over with the wheelchair while I fretted over various bits and pieces.   I've been told I'm quite OCD about my antennas. ;-))

UPDATE : 6th September 2018 --   Well the first hard rain since putting the antenna up and the SWR has shot up to 6:1 oh bother this means sadly I'll be off 2m for awhile until I can get the antennas down and workout where the water has got, I suspect the Powabeam driven element ABS moulded fixing block which I had heard can give issues I thought I had sealed it up with extra sealant but obviously not!